Tuesday, March 17, 2015

7 Seafaring and Fair Seeing: Part II



Concerning the significance of American Literature:  When Herman Melville publishes Moby-Dick, this nation is but 75 years old—can we believe a nation might produce its “great classic” in just 75 years?  This indicates a deeper question:

Is America old enough to have classics at all?

Any American novel has not yet stood the test of time, considering the age-old literary legacy with which it means to converse.  As a student of American letters—a student by necessity, because I love this nation’s literature—I advocate a sterner test.  I do not mean to diminish time’s aptitude for sifting chaff (in many cases, I await it eagerly), I only wish to clarify a measurement by which the reader can rest assured that great new books will stand the test of time, time being allowed.  The test of time is but a secondary proof.

To argue this, I will consider Dante’s The Divine Comedy, a chief influence of Melville’s.  Dante’s introduction, via Virgil, to Homer, Horace, Ovid, and Lucan in Canto Four of Inferno is widely known, and his admission as a sixth in that personified library inspires not a few knowing nods.  This authorial choice may well be a form of medieval marketing, yet in such a work, one cannot dismiss it as merely advantageous to the author.  In this scene, Dante signifies, quite consciously and unmistakably, what he intends his text to be: another Great Epic, in the model of the past.  And, time makes plain, it is just that!  So how, in 1308, can Dante know his epic poem will stand beside that of his ancient maestro-poet?  How, if not by some means other than the test of time?

One might reply, any madman can write “I am Homer” on a page, yet only one has stood the test.  Of the others who have done this, we will never know.

Another scene—one of my favorites—more deeply answers the matter.  Beatrice’s stern rebuke of Dante, at the close of Purgatorio, contains what I consider to be the greatest moral lesson in the poem.  Her admonishment reduces thus: love what lasts forever.  Consider her words:

            “…But by the bounteous gifts of divine grace—
                        whose rain descends from mists of such great height,
                        blest eyes themselves cannot approach that place—
            [Dante] was so disposed in his new life
                        that every natural habit, turned to good,
                        should have been put to wondrous proof in him,
            But when bad seed is sown in a rich field
                        or when earth full of vigor lies untilled,
                        the thornier and more harmful is its yield.
            For a time I sustained him with my sight:
                        showing to him my youthful eyes, I led him
                        and turned him with me toward the true and right.
            But once I stood upon the threshold of
                        my second age, exchanging life for life,
                        he took himself from me and gave his love
            To someone else.  From flesh to spirit I rose
                        and found less favor in his eyes, although
                        I’d grown more beautiful and virtuous.
            He turned his steps along a way not true,
                        pursuing the false images of good,
                        which promise all and never follow through.”
                                    (Trans. Anthony Esolen. The Modern Library Classics.)

This provides a final explanation of Dante’s beginning lost in a dark wood (see Melville’s Ishmael, blog post #4).  Beatrice’s reproach—love what lasts forever—requires Dante to have loved immediately her “youthful eyes” and to have maintained that love even after she has parted from the world.  Beatrice, throughout the text, signifies Beauty itself: the object of every poet.  She is Eurydice to his lyric Orpheus.  He must love her absent as well as present, and from the first.  By his first true love of Beauty, Dante can distinguish what is lasting from the “false images of good.”

Thus, Dante not only can perceive the lasting good, but he must—even in its youth.  Beauty requires it.  Greatness in a novel offers and requires the same.  Melville knows what he’s doing when he begins: “Call me Ishmael.”  A story so begun, in the hands of a master, cannot fail to stand the test of time.  I guarantee it.  This is the beauty of truth, that its goodness might be loved, even in its youth.

This blog intends to do so.  One more point remains to ground this novel firmly on this youthful nation, firmly rooted in the past’s great literature, and blooming with an equal greatness.  From then on, all is loving Beauty and a story’s power to convey.

No comments:

Post a Comment